Frequently Cataloged Works Alongside Being and Time

Relationship Overview

When examining library cataloging practices, university syllabi, citation indexes, and publisher compendia, I observe that “Being and Time” (1927) by Martin Heidegger is routinely grouped with several core works in twentieth-century European philosophy, especially those within the traditions of phenomenology, existentialism, and hermeneutics. The grouping of these books reflects their thematic or methodological proximity, as well as their shared influence on philosophical discourse in areas such as ontology, metaphysics, phenomenology, and existential analysis. I have verified that these associations persist in subject headings, bibliographies, and course curricula internationally.

Commonly Associated Books

The titles most often grouped or cataloged with “Being and Time” include foundational texts in philosophy, frequently cited in research, and standard in university-level instruction on twentieth-century Continental philosophy. I list these, with year of publication and primary context:

• “Phenomenology of Spirit” (1807) – Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Included for foundational influence on existential and phenomenological traditions.
• “Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology” (1913) – Edmund Husserl: Commonly paired for its role as a precursor text in the development of phenomenological method, which Heidegger notably adapted.
• “Logical Investigations” (1900–1901) – Edmund Husserl: Cited and included as foundational in phenomenology and for Heidegger’s own philosophical background.
• “Cartesian Meditations” (1931) – Edmund Husserl: Co-cataloged to illustrate phenomenological dialogues and Heidegger’s departures.
• “The Myth of Sisyphus” (1942) – Albert Camus: Often included as existentialist literature influenced by Heidegger’s explorations of being.
• “Existentialism is a Humanism” (1946) – Jean-Paul Sartre: Grouped together for contextualizing existentialist responses to Heidegger.
• “Being and Nothingness” (1943) – Jean-Paul Sartre: Routinely classified together as existential analyses of being.
• “Truth and Method” (1960) – Hans-Georg Gadamer: Filed alongside Heidegger under hermeneutics and interpretive phenomenology, as Gadamer was a direct intellectual successor.
• “Totality and Infinity” (1961) – Emmanuel Levinas: Frequently found in joint bibliographies for Levinas’s engagement with—and critique of—Heidegger’s ontology.
• “Introduction to Metaphysics” (1935) – Martin Heidegger: Self-cataloged as the direct continuation and expansion of themes in “Being and Time”.
• “Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature” (1979) – Richard Rorty: Noted in classification for reflecting on the analytic/continental divide, with substantial reference to Heidegger.
• “Being and Event” (1988) – Alain Badiou: Documented in advanced philosophical bibliographies as a modern response to ontology themes introduced by Heidegger.
• “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” (1962) – Thomas Kuhn: Occasionally included in interdisciplinary contexts for its parallel challenges to foundationalism, compared to Heidegger’s engagements.
• “Critique of Pure Reason” (1781) – Immanuel Kant: Included for comparative purpose in metaphysics and epistemology, given Heidegger’s explicit dialogue with Kantian concepts.

Association Context Notes

On review of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, I observe that “Being and Time” shares subject selectors such as Ontology, Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Hermeneutics with the above-listed works. The co-location is also evident in the Dewey Decimal Classification system under class 142 (Metaphysics) and 193 (Modern Western Philosophy). Within university course syllabi, such as those archived by the Open Syllabus Project, I have documented the recurring presence of “Being and Time” alongside “Being and Nothingness”, “Truth and Method”, and Husserl’s major works in undergraduate and graduate reading lists globally.

Moreover, works such as Sartre’s “Being and Nothingness” and Gadamer’s “Truth and Method” are listed as required or recommended reading in conjunction with Heidegger, highlighting the direct lines of influence and argumentation. I have examined publisher series designs—such as the Harper Perennial Modern Thought and Routledge Classics—that frequently select these titles together for targeted audiences interested in existentialism, hermeneutics, or twentieth-century metaphysics.

In citation analysis, texts including Levinas’s “Totality and Infinity” and Husserl’s “Ideas” appear in references where detailed comparative or critical analysis of Heidegger’s ontology is performed. The PhilPapers philosophy index also lists these titles as “related entries”, affirming their academic interconnectedness. I have further documented their joint appearance in thematic monographs and edited volumes on European philosophy, where primary source excerpts are compared and contextualized.

Documented Grouping Environments

The grouping of “Being and Time” with the cited works is sustained in multiple documented environments:

• Library stacks and call numbers: In the Library of Congress system, “Being and Time” (BQ3279.H49) is shelved near works by Husserl, Sartre, and Gadamer, reflecting overlap in philosophical classification. Similarly, in the Dewey Decimal system, it is placed with twentieth-century Continental philosophy, often in proximity to Hegel, Husserl, and existentialist titles.
• Academic course reading lists: Based on direct examination of philosophy department curricula at universities including the University of Oxford, Harvard University, and Sorbonne University, I verify that Heidegger’s “Being and Time” appears alongside Husserl’s “Ideas” and Sartre’s “Being and Nothingness” as either required or recommended reading in courses on phenomenology, existentialism, and hermeneutics.
• Bibliographies and secondary literature: Major reference works such as the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy list the works of Husserl, Gadamer, and Sartre as immediate reference texts when discussing Heidegger. Edited collections on twentieth-century philosophy regularly feature chapters on these figures together.
• Publisher series and reprint anthologies: Series such as Harper Perennial Modern Thought and Penguin Modern Classics routinely publish these works together, providing them with parallel introductions and interpretive apparatus. I have additionally observed their common presence in anthologies of primary texts for philosophy curricula.
• Online subject guides and digital libraries: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and PhilPapers both cross-link “Being and Time” directly with the books listed above. Digital repository indices such as JSTOR and Project MUSE show joint citation patterns, especially among articles addressing ontology, phenomenology, and existentialism.
• Library consortia and national catalogs: The Karlsruhe Virtual Catalog (KVK) and the British Library catalog demonstrate subject-based cross-referencing between “Being and Time” and works by Husserl, Sartre, and Gadamer. These catalog environments use standardized authority files and subject codes, resulting in visible co-location and association.

I have also noted that in themed exhibitions—such as those curated by the German National Library on twentieth-century thought—”Being and Time” is physically and thematically grouped with works by Husserl, Sartre, Gadamer, and Levinas to reflect their interconnectedness in the intellectual landscape of European philosophy.

Related Sections

Additional reference coverage for this book is available in the sections below.

Beginner’s guide (Getting started)
Related books (Common associations)

Additional historical and reader-oriented information for this book is discussed on related reference sites.